The ethics statement of the scientific publication code is based on LIPI Regulation No. 5 of 2014 concerning the Ethics of the Scientific Publication Code, which upholds 3 ethical values in publications, namely: (i) neutrality, clear from conflicts of interest in the processing of publications; (ii) fairness, giving the author the right to claim the paper; and (iii) Honesty, clearly from duplication, fabrication, forgery, and plagiarism (DF2P) in publications. Ethics This publication has also been adapted to COPE

Publication and Writing

1. All papers submitted are subject to a rigorous peer-review process by at least two reviewers who are   experts in a particular paper field.

2. The review process is a blind peer review.

3. Factors considered in the review are relevance, health, significance, originality, readability, and language.

4. Possible decisions include acceptance, acceptance with revision, or rejection.

5. If the author is encouraged to revise and resubmit the post, there is no guarantee that the revised post will be accepted

6. Articles that are rejected will not be reviewed.

7. Paper acceptance is limited by legal requirements that will apply regarding defamation, copyright infringement, and plagiarism.

8. There is no research that can be included in more than one publication.

Editor's Responsibility

1. The editor has full responsibility and authority to reject / accept articles.

2. The editor is responsible for the overall content and quality of the publication.

3. Editors must always consider the needs of writers and readers when trying to improve publication.

4. The editor must guarantee the quality of papers and the integrity of academic records.

5. The editor must publish the wrong page or make corrections when needed.

6. The editor must have a clear picture of the source of research funding.

7. Editors must base their decisions on only one importance, authenticity, clarity, and relevance of the paper to the scope of the publication.

8. Editors may not reverse their decision or cancel the previous editor's decision without serious reason.

9. The editor must maintain the confidentiality of the reviewer.

10. Editors must ensure that all research material they publish complies with internationally accepted ethical guidelines.

11. Editors should only accept papers if they are confident.

12. Editors must act if they suspect a violation, whether a paper is published or not, and make all reasonable efforts to continue to get a resolution to the problem.

13. Editors may not reject papers based on suspicion, they must have proof of violations.

14. Editors may not allow conflicts of interest between staff, writers, reviewers and board members.

Author's Responsibilities

1. Authors must state that their manuscripts are their original work.

2. The author must state that the manuscript has never been published elsewhere.

3. The author must state that the current manuscript is not considered for publication elsewhere.

4. Authors must participate in the peer review process.

5. The author is required to do repeal or correction of errors. All authors mentioned in the paper must make a significant contribution to the research.

6. The author must state that all data in this paper is real and original.

7. The writer must tell the Editor about a conflict of interest.

8. Authors must identify all sources used in making their manuscripts.

9. Authors must report any errors they find in published papers to the Editor

Reviewer Responsibilities

1. Reviewers must keep all information about the paper confidential and treat it as special information.

2. Reviews must be made objectively, without personal criticism from the author

3. Reviewers must express their views clearly with supporting arguments

4. The reviewer must identify the relevant published work that has not been cited by the author.

5. The reviewer must also request that the Editor-in-Chief pay attention to any substantial similarities or overlaps between the manuscripts being considered and other published papers which have personal knowledge.

6. Reviewers may not review manuscripts that have a conflict of interest as a result of competition, collaboration, or other relationships or connections with the authors, companies, or institutions connected with the paper.