Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir is a scientific periodical journal managed by peer-review. Other scientists (peer-review) evaluate the article's value and credibility before publication. This journal is dedicated to publishing scientific papers in the study of hadith interpretations and the Quran from different aspects and perspectives and the themes that have been determined. This journal is available in print with ISSN: 2746-9050 and online with ISSN: 2746-9042 and published twice a year, in June and December. Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir aims to become one of the forums for ideas and results of researches dissemination in the field of hadith interpretations and Quran. In addition, it also can be a significant reference in the same area. Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir committed to keeping maintaining the high ethical standard in the scientific publication include the peer-review, author, journal editor, and publisher. 


The publication of an article in Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir is an essential building block in developing a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the authors' work and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles help and embody the scientific methods. It is therefore essential to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the editor, the reviewer, the publisher, and the society. As the publisher of Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor, Indonesia, takes its duties guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and it recognizes its ethical and other responsibilities. Sekolah Tinggi Agama Islam Al Hidayah Bogor, Indonesia, is committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint, or additional commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication Decisions 

The editors of Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir are responsible for deciding which articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement, and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making their decisions.

Fair Play 

An editor at any time evaluates manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.


The editors and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in editors' research without the author's express written consent.


Contribution to Editorial Decisions 

Peer review assists the editors in making editorial decisions, and through the editorial communications with the authors may also assist the author in improving the quality of the paper.


Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editors and excuse himself from the review process.


Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity 

Reviewers should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgment of Sources 

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that the authors have not cited. Any statement that Reviewers had previously reported observation, derivation, or argument should be accompanied by a proper citation. A reviewer should also call to the editors' attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest 

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships with any of the authors, companies, or institutions related to the papers.

Review Process 

Every manuscript submitted to Al-Kauniyah: Jurnal Ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Tafsir is independently reviewed by at least two reviewers in the form of a "double-blind review." The publication, amendment, or rejection decision is based upon their reports/recommendations. In some instances, the editor may submit an article for review to another third reviewer before deciding, if necessary.


Reporting Standards 

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed and an objective discussion of its significance. Authors should represent underlying data accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behavior and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism 

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others, this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant, or Concurrent Publication

An author should not, in general, publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper 

Authorship should be limited to those who have contributed to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported research. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where others have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included in the paper. All co-authors have seen and approved the article's final version and agreed to its publication submission.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest 

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or another substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in Published Works 

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in their published work, they must promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.