POLITENESS IN ACCEPTING AND REJECTING OPINIONS: INSIGHTS FROM 4th QATAR INTERNATIONAL ARABIC DEBATE VIDEOS FOR ARABIC SPEAKING LESSONS

  • Nudya Kuntum Khoirel Abidah Universitas Brawijaya
Keywords: Discourse analysis, Politeness in speech, International Arabic Qatar Debate, Arabic Speaking

Abstract

Abstract: Qatar International Arabic Debate is a prestigious event and a reference in the practice of Arabic debate in the world. Participants who enter the event are the best representatives of countries in the world. Therefore, the ability to speak Arabic is good, besides that in delivering, accepting, and rejecting arguments in the debate has been arranged in a good systematic and polite manner. The researcher is interested in examining the sentence patterns used in accepting and rejecting opinions in Arabic debates with the aim that the results of the analysis can be utilised in speaking practice in Arabic language classes.  To diversify the ways of teaching speaking skills and improve students' efficiency in expressing opinions with the beauty of correct Arabic. This research uses a qualitative method with listening and note-taking techniques and uses classification referring to Leech's concept of appropriateness. The results of this study show that the words uttered in the Arabic scientific debate have a good and polite systematic in accepting and rejecting the opponent's opinion. In addition, this research produces a formulation of Arabic sentence patterns and teaching methods that are ready to be used in the practice of learning to speak Arabic through classroom debates. So that the results of this research are applicable and useful for a wider audience.

Keywords: Discourse analysis, Politeness in speech, International Arabic Qatar Debate, Arabic Speaking

References

Abd Razak, Najjah Salwa, Masdini Harina Ab Manan, Nor Azliana Akmal Jamaludin, NurHidayati Mohd Rafy, and Mhd Faizal Mhd Ramli. “STUDENTS’ ACTIVE ROLES IN ARABIC LANGUAGE DEBATE ACTIVITIES IN NDUM.” Journal of Defence Management, Social Science & Humanities 3, no. 2 (December 31, 2020). https://doi.org/10.58247/jdmssh-2020-0302-07.

“ANALISIS-NARATIF-ANALISIS-KONTEN-DAN-ANALISIS-SEMIOTIK,” n.d.

Astari, Rika, Alvinda Yunaz, and Muhammad Irfan Faturrahman. “The Grammatical Deviations in The Arabic Debate Competition in Indonesia.” Arabiyat : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Dan Kebahasaaraban 9, no. 2 (December 31, 2022): 178–90. https://doi.org/10.15408/a.v9i2.29008.

Azhan Norul, Nor, and Noor Shamshinar Zakaria. “MEMPRAKTIK KEMAHIRAN BERTUTUR DALAM BAHASA ARAB DAN KHIDMAT SOSIAL MELALUI PEMBELAJARAN BERASASKAN PROJEK Practicing Arabic Speaking Skills and Community Service Through Project-Based Learning.” Malaysian Online Journal of Education. Vol. 5, 2021.

Eshreteh, Mahmood K. M., and Huda Badran. “The Application of Leech�s Politeness Maxims in Shakespeare�s The Merchant of Venice.” Indonesian Journal of English Language Studies (IJELS) 6, no. 2 (September 25, 2020): 60–76. https://doi.org/10.24071/ijels.v6i2.1091.

Fikri, Shofil, Umi Machmudah, Halimi Halimi, and Faisal Mahmoud Adam Ibrahim. “The Debate Strategy And Its Contribution To The Arabic Learner’s Competence/ استراتيجيّة المناظرة و اسهامها على كفاءة المتعلّم اللغة العربية.” Ijaz Arabi Journal of Arabic Learning 4, no. 3 (October 30, 2021). https://doi.org/10.18860/ijazarabi.v4i3.12306.

Khair, Andi Ummul. “Error Analysis of the Language Transfer in Grammar Construction of the Brain.” International Journal of Humanities and Innovation (IJHI) 1, no. 3 (September 5, 2018): 36–44. https://doi.org/10.33750/ijhi.v1i3.22.

Mohamed, Ahmad Syahmi, Nik Farhan Mustapha, Ab Halim Mohamad, Rosya Izyanie Shamshudeen, and Nurazan Mohmad Rouyan. “Oral Communication Strategies Preferences in Arabic Debate among Non-Arabic Speakers.” International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences 11, no. 9 (September 7, 2021). https://doi.org/10.6007/ijarbss/v11-i9/10758.

Nasution, Lukman Hakim, and Ali Fuddin Nasution. “METODE PEMBELAJARAN BAHASA ARAB DI KELAS SYARQI AWWAL LEMBAGA KURSUS MARKAZ ARABIYAH PARE KEDIRI.” Journal Transformation of Mandalika 4, no. 6 (2023). http://ojs.cahayamandalika.com/index.php/jtm/issue/archive.

Ni’matul Fauziah, Rachma, Muhammad Afthon, Ulin Nuha, Uin Sayyid, Ali Rahmatullah, and Tulungagung Indonesia. “PENERAPAN METODE AS-SAM’IYYAH ASY-SYAFAWIYAH UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN BERBICARA BAHASA ARAB PESERTA DIDIK Oleh,” n.d.

Ningsih, Rika, Endry Boeriswati, and Liliana Muliastuti. “LANGUAGE POLITENESS OF STUDENTS AND TEACHERS: AN ETHNOGRAPHIC STUDY.” Getsempena English Education Journal (GEEJ) 7, no. 1 (2020).

Noeraeni, Rani. “ANALISIS KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA POLITIKUS DALAM PROGRAM INDONESIA LAWYERS CLUB DI TV ONE.” Educatioanl Journal: General and Specific Research 3, no. Februari (2023): 154–63.

Wahyuningsih, Indah. “Analisis Wacana Kritis Pada Debat Pilwakot Surakarta Putaran Kedua Tahun 2020.” ESTETIK : Jurnal Bahasa Indonesia 4, no. 1 (July 2, 2021): 17. https://doi.org/10.29240/estetik.v4i1.2197.

Published
2024-06-19
How to Cite
Nudya Kuntum Khoirel Abidah. (2024). POLITENESS IN ACCEPTING AND REJECTING OPINIONS: INSIGHTS FROM 4th QATAR INTERNATIONAL ARABIC DEBATE VIDEOS FOR ARABIC SPEAKING LESSONS. El-Jaudah : Jurnal Pendidikan Bahasa Dan Sastra Arab, 5(1), 71-81. https://doi.org/10.56874/ej.v5i1.1824