Learning From Peers: Students’ Perceptions of Peer Teaching in Basic Grammar for ESP Courses
Keywords:
ESP, Grammar, Peer TeachingAbstract
This study explores students’ perceptions of peer teaching in a Basic English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course in an Indonesian private university. The research investigates how peer teaching influences learners’ understanding of grammar and vocabulary, their confidence, and their classroom engagement. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through a focus group discussion with six fifth-semester students. Findings reveal that peer teaching creates a relaxed learning atmosphere that reduces anxiety and increases students’ willingness to ask questions. Participants reported deeper comprehension of grammar when peers provided simplified explanations, although complex structures still required clarification from the lecturer. Peer interaction increased students’ confidence, encouraged active participation, and strengthened their learning autonomy. However, participants emphasized the need for better tutor preparation, clearer guidelines, and stronger lecturer support to ensure accuracy and coherence during instruction. The study concludes that peer teaching effectively complements lecturer-led instruction by fostering supportive learning environments and enhancing grammar-focused learning. The implications highlight the importance of structured peer-teaching design, adequate tutor training, and balanced integration with teacher-led explanations to maximize learning outcomes in ESP contexts.
References
Alharbi, A. (2020). The impact of peer collaboration on EFL learners’ speaking anxiety and fluency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1104.04
Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.
Basturkmen, H. (2021). Key issues in English for Specific Purposes in higher education. Routledge.
Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International.
Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., and Gai, X. (2021). Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541
Derakhshan, A., Greenier, V., Fathi, J., & Rastgar, M. (2023). Toward an emotion-involved classroom: Positive psychology in applied linguistics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09863-0
Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001
Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice (eBook ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091218
Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications.
Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x
Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.
Kurniawan, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Students’ attitudes toward peer teaching in EFL speaking classes. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34931
MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a second language. Language Learning, 48(3), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571
Muranoi, Y. (2023). Enhancing learner autonomy through peer-led instruction in EFL classrooms. In A. Smith & L. Rogers (Eds.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 115–132). Routledge.
Nguyen, T., & Pham, L. (2023). Enhancing learner autonomy in ESP through peer-assisted learning: A mixed-methods study. Asian ESP Journal, 19(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24333
Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2022). Affective dimensions of autonomous learning in ESP contexts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939705
Resnik, P., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2021). Learner emotions, autonomy and trait emotional intelligence in in-person versus emergency remote teaching. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0096
Ruiz-Garrido, M. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in designing ESP speaking tasks for diverse learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968
Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.
Teng, F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Supporting EFL learners’ self-efficacy and engagement through collaborative learning. Language Teaching Research, 25(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819859619
Topping, K. (2020). Peer-assisted learning: Developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09466-8
Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.
Zarrinabadi, N., & Rezazadeh, M. (2020). Willingness to communicate, supportive peers, and classroom interaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1599414
Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Libraries Unlimited.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
All articles published in the Journal of English Education and Linguistics are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license. This means anyone is free to copy, transform, or redistribute articles for any lawful purpose in any medium, provided they give appropriate attribution to the original author(s) and Journal of English Education and Linguistics, link to the license, indicate if changes were made, and redistribute any derivative work under the same license.
Copyright on articles is retained by the respective author(s) without restrictions. A non-exclusive license is granted to the Journal of English Education and Linguistics to publish the article and identify itself as its original publisher, along with the commercial right to include the article in a hardcopy issue for sale to libraries and individuals.
Although the conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International (CC BY-SA) license do not apply to authors (as the copyright holder of your article, you have no restrictions on your rights), by submitting to the Journal of English Education and Linguistics, authors recognize the rights of readers and must grant any third party the right to use their articles to the extent provided by the license.

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.





