Learning From Peers: Students’ Perceptions of Peer Teaching in Basic Grammar for ESP Courses

Authors

  • Laser Universitas PGRI Yogyakarta

Keywords:

ESP, Grammar, Peer Teaching

Abstract

This study explores students’ perceptions of peer teaching in a Basic English for Specific Purposes (ESP) course in an Indonesian private university. The research investigates how peer teaching influences learners’ understanding of grammar and vocabulary, their confidence, and their classroom engagement. Using a qualitative descriptive design, data were collected through a focus group discussion with six fifth-semester students. Findings reveal that peer teaching creates a relaxed learning atmosphere that reduces anxiety and increases students’ willingness to ask questions. Participants reported deeper comprehension of grammar when peers provided simplified explanations, although complex structures still required clarification from the lecturer. Peer interaction increased students’ confidence, encouraged active participation, and strengthened their learning autonomy. However, participants emphasized the need for better tutor preparation, clearer guidelines, and stronger lecturer support to ensure accuracy and coherence during instruction. The study concludes that peer teaching effectively complements lecturer-led instruction by fostering supportive learning environments and enhancing grammar-focused learning. The implications highlight the importance of structured peer-teaching design, adequate tutor training, and balanced integration with teacher-led explanations to maximize learning outcomes in ESP contexts.

References

Alharbi, A. (2020). The impact of peer collaboration on EFL learners’ speaking anxiety and fluency. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 11(4), 567–575. https://doi.org/10.17507/jltr.1104.04

Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. W.H. Freeman.

Basturkmen, H. (2021). Key issues in English for Specific Purposes in higher education. Routledge.

Boyce, C., & Neale, P. (2006). Conducting in-depth interviews: A guide for designing and conducting in-depth interviews for evaluation input. Pathfinder International.

Cui, Y., Schunn, C. D., and Gai, X. (2021). Peer feedback and teacher feedback: a comparative study of revision effectiveness in writing instruction for EFL learners. Higher Educ. Res. Dev. https://doi.org/10.1080/07294360.2021.1969541

Derakhshan, A., Greenier, V., Fathi, J., & Rastgar, M. (2023). Toward an emotion-involved classroom: Positive psychology in applied linguistics. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 52(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-022-09863-0

Fiorella, L., & Mayer, R. E. (2013). The relative benefits of learning by teaching and teaching expectancy. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 38(4), 281–288. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cedpsych.2013.06.001

Gregersen, T., & MacIntyre, P. D. (2014). Capitalizing on language learners’ individuality: From premise to practice (eBook ed.). Multilingual Matters. https://doi.org/10.21832/9781783091218

Guest, G., MacQueen, K. M., & Namey, E. (2012). Applied thematic analysis. SAGE Publications.

Horwitz, E. K., Horwitz, M. B., & Cope, J. (1986). Foreign language classroom anxiety. The Modern Language Journal, 70(2), 125–132. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-4781.1986.tb05256.x

Krashen, S. (1982). Principles and practice in second language acquisition. Pergamon Press.

Kurniawan, D., & Wahyuni, S. (2021). Students’ attitudes toward peer teaching in EFL speaking classes. Indonesian Journal of Applied Linguistics, 11(3), 648–659. https://doi.org/10.17509/ijal.v11i3.34931

MacIntyre, P. D., Clément, R., Dörnyei, Z., & Noels, K. A. (1998). Conceptualizing willingness to communicate in a second language. Language Learning, 48(3), 545–579. https://doi.org/10.1111/0023-8333.00047

Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldaña, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A methods sourcebook (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Merriam, S. B., & Tisdell, E. J. (2015). Qualitative research: A guide to design and implementation (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.

Mohajan, H. K. (2018). Qualitative research methodology in social sciences and related subjects. Journal of Economic Development, Environment and People, 7(1), 23–48. https://doi.org/10.26458/jedep.v7i1.571

Muranoi, Y. (2023). Enhancing learner autonomy through peer-led instruction in EFL classrooms. In A. Smith & L. Rogers (Eds.), Fostering autonomy in language learning (pp. 115–132). Routledge.

Nguyen, T., & Pham, L. (2023). Enhancing learner autonomy in ESP through peer-assisted learning: A mixed-methods study. Asian ESP Journal, 19(1), 112–135. https://doi.org/10.54855/ijli.24333

Reinders, H., & Benson, P. (2022). Affective dimensions of autonomous learning in ESP contexts. Innovation in Language Learning and Teaching, 16(2), 119–130. https://doi.org/10.1080/17501229.2021.1939705

Resnik, P., & Dewaele, J.-M. (2021). Learner emotions, autonomy and trait emotional intelligence in in-person versus emergency remote teaching. Applied Linguistics Review, 12(3), 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1515/applirev-2020-0096

Ruiz-Garrido, M. (2021). Challenges and opportunities in designing ESP speaking tasks for diverse learners. Journal of English for Academic Purposes, 51, 100968. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeap.2021.100968

Saldaña, J. (2011). Fundamentals of qualitative research. Oxford University Press.

Teng, F., & Zhang, L. J. (2021). Supporting EFL learners’ self-efficacy and engagement through collaborative learning. Language Teaching Research, 25(1), 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1177/1362168819859619

Topping, K. (2020). Peer-assisted learning: Developments and future directions. Educational Psychology Review, 32(1), 1–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-019-09466-8

Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Harvard University Press.

Zarrinabadi, N., & Rezazadeh, M. (2020). Willingness to communicate, supportive peers, and classroom interaction. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 41(3), 226–240. https://doi.org/10.1080/01434632.2019.1599414

Zhang, Y., & Wildemuth, B. M. (2009). Qualitative analysis of content. In B. M. Wildemuth (Ed.), Applications of social research methods to questions in information and library science (pp. 308–319). Libraries Unlimited.

Downloads

Published

2025-12-20