An Analysis of Mathematics Learning Difficulties among High-Ability Students in Solving Systems of Linear Equations in Two Variables (SLETV)
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.56874//jmtl.2025.v4.i1/2628/5Keywords:
learning difficulties, mathematical problem solving, high-achieveing students, linear equation in two variablesAbstract
This study aims to analyze the learning difficulties experienced by high-achieving students in solving problems on the topic of Linear Equations in Two Variables. The research employed a descriptive qualitative approach with one eighth-grade student from SMP Negeri 4 Tasikmalaya as the subject, selected through purposive sampling based on teacher recommendations and daily test scores. Data were collected through a problem-solving test based on NCTM indicators and unstructured interviews, then analyzed using the Miles and Huberman model. The findings revealed that the high-achieving student was able to complete all stages of problem solving (understanding the problem, formulating strategies, applying strategies, and interpreting results). However, difficulties were identified in arithmetic accuracy, limitations in mathematical language, and external factors such as insufficient repetition of material and lack of pedagogical support. The study concludes that learning difficulties may still occur among high-achieving students, thus teachers should provide interventions that strengthen mathematical communication, repeated practice, and reflective learning. Future research is recommended to involve more high-achieving students to obtain a more comprehensive understanding of their learning difficulties.
References
Arifin, Z., Trapsilasiwi, D., & Fatahillah, A. (2016). Analisis Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematika Dalam Menyelesaikan Masalah Pada Pokok Bahasan Sistem Persamaan Linier Dua Variabel Siswa Kelas VIII-C SMP Nuris Jember. Jurnal Edukasi, 3(2), 9–12. https://doi.org/10.19184/jukasi.v3i2.3522
As’ari, A. R., Tohir, M., Valentino, E., & Imron, Z. (2017). Matematika SMP/MTs kelas VIII semester 1. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Baba, T. (2023). Local competence and model eliciting activities. AIP Conference Proceedings, 2733(1). https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0160578
Bicer, A., Navruz, B., Capraro, R. M., Capraro, M. M., Oner, T. A., & Boedeker, P. (2015). STEM schools vs. non-STEM schools: Comparing students’ mathematics growth rate on high-stakes test performance. International Journal of New Trends in Education and Their Implications, 6(1), 138–150.
Blum, W., & Ferri, R. B. (2009). Mathematical modelling: Can it be taught and learnt. Journal of Mathematical Modelling and Application, 1(1), 45–58.
Cai, J., & Lester, F. (2010). Why is teaching with problem solving important to student learning. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, 13(12), 1–6.
Callejo, M. L., & Zapatera, A. (2017). Prospective primary teachers’ noticing of students’ understanding of pattern generalization. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 20, 309–333.
Epriyanti, S. (2016). Deskripsi Analisis Kesulitan Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal SPLDV Siswa SMA Kelas XI. Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika FKIP-UKSW.
Frederick, M. L., Courtney, S., & Caniglia, J. (2014). With a Little Help from My Friends: Scaffolding Techniques in Problem Solving. Investigations in Mathematics Learning, 7(2), 21–32. https://doi.org/10.1080/24727466.2014.11790340
Guhn, M., Gadermann, A., & Wu, A. D. (2014). Trends in International Mathematics and Science Study (TIMSS). In A. C. Michalos (Ed.), Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research (pp. 6737–6739). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_3063
Hussin, H., Kamal, N., & Ibrahim, M. F. (2019). Inculcating problem solving and analytical skills in STEM education practices: The CRYsTaL initiatives. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 9(6).
Jupri, A., Drijvers, P., & van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, M. (2014). Difficulties in initial algebra learning in Indonesia. Mathematics Education Research Journal, 26(4), 683–710. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13394-013-0097-0
Kapur, M., & Rummel, N. (2012). Productive failure in learning from generation and invention activities. Instructional Science, 40, 645–650.
Kebudayaan, K. P. D. (2012). Dokumen kurikulum 2013. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.
Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. National Academies Press.
Krulik, S., & Rudnick, J. A. (1988). Problem Solving: A Handbook for Elementary School Teachers. ERIC.
Lanya, H. (2016). Pemahaman konsep perbandingan siswa SMP berkemampuan matematika rendah. Sigma, 2(1), 19–22.
Lewis, S. T. (2021). Theorizing “Modelling as Bridge” between content and vehicle. Mathematical Modelling Education in East and West, 45–54. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-66996-6_4
Liljedahl, P. G. (2005). Mathematical discovery and affect: The effect of AHA! experiences on undergraduate mathematics students. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 36(2–3), 219–234. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207390412331316997
Martini, J. (2014). Perspektif, Asesmen dan Penanggulangannya Bagi Anak Usia Dini dan Usia Sekolah. Bogor: Ghalia Indonesia.
Maryani, A., & Setiawan, W. (2021). Analisis Kesulitan Peserta Didik Kelas VIII dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel (SPLDV) di MTs Atsauri Sindangkerta. Jurnal Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 5(3), 2619–2627.
Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Fundamentals of qualitative data analysis. Qualitative Data Analysis: A Methods Sourcebook, 3.
Nasional, D. P. (2006). Permendiknas No. 22 Tahun 2006 tentang standar isi. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
NCTM. (1989). Curriculum and evaluation standards for school mathematics. National Council of Teachers of Mathematics.
Novianti, D., Hidayat, W., Siliwangi, I., Terusan, J., Sudirman, J., Cimahi, J., & Barat, I. (2020). Analisi Kemampuan Siswa MTs Dalam Berpikir Kreatif Matematis Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linear Dua Variabel. Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Inovatif, 3(6), 595–604.
Nugrawati, U., Nuryakin, & Afrilianto, M. (2018). Analisis Kesulitan Belajar Pada Kemampuan Komunikasi Matematis Siswa MTs di Kota Cimahi Dengan Materi Segitiga dan Segiempat. IndoMath: Indonesia Mathematics Education, 1(2), 63–68. https://doi.org/10.30738/indomath.v1i2.2543
OECD. (2019). PISA 2018 Assessment and Analytical Framework. In OECD Publishing.
Pesona, R. I., & Yunianta, T. N. H. (2018). Deskripsi kemampuan matematika siswa dalam pemecahan masalah sistem persamaan linear dua variabel berdasarkan level taksonomi solo. Jurnal Genta Mulia, 9(1), 99–109.
Polya, G. (1973). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (1st ed.). Princeton University Press.
Prismana, R. D. E., Kusmayadi, T. A., & Pramudya, I. (2018). Analysis of difficulties in mathematics problem solving based on revised Bloom’s Taxonomy viewed from high self-efficacy. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1008(1), 12063. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1008/1/012063
Purnamasari, I., & Setiawan, W. (2019). Kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa SMP pada materi SPLDV ditinjau dari kemampuan awal matematika (KAM). Journal of Medives: Journal of Mathematics Education IKIP Veteran Semarang, 3(2), 207–215. https://doi.org/10.31331/medivesveteran.v3i2.771
Rosyidah, A. S., Hidayanto, E., & Muksar, M. (2021). Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa SMP dalam Menyelesaikan Soal HOTS Geometri. JIPM, 10(2), 268–283. https://doi.org/10.25273/jipm.v10i2.8819
Sari, P. D. R., & Subekti, E. E. (2023). Analisis Kesulitan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Pemecahan Masalah Matematika materi Operasi Hitung Pecahan di Kelas V SD Negeri Kauman Blora. Jurnal Wawasan Pendidikan, 3(1), 227–237. https://doi.org/10.26877/wp.v3i1.11357
Schoenfeld, A. H. (2016). Learning to think mathematically: Problem solving, metacognition, and sense making in mathematics (Reprint). Journal of Education, 196(2), 1–38. https://doi.org/10.1177/002205741619600202
Siregar, T. (2023). Pengaruh Minat dan Kreativitas Belajar terhadap Prestasi Matematika Mahasiswa pada Mata Kuliah Kalkulus. Journal of Mathematics in Teaching and Learning, 2(1), 32–42.
Slawantya, Y. R. (2024). Pengembangan e-modul dengan pendekatan problem Based Learning Integratif untuk meningkatkan penalaran Aljabar dan sikap spiritual peserta didik. Universitas Islam Negeri Maulana Malik Ibrahim.
Stacey, K., & MacGregor, M. (1999). Learning the algebraic method of solving problems. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 18(2), 149–167. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0732-3123(99)00026-7
Sugiyono. (2018). Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta Bandung.
Suhendra, D., Sugianto, S., & Suratman, D. (2016). Potensi Penalaran Adaptif Matematis Siswa Dalam Materi Persamaan Garis Lurus Di Sekolah Menengah Pertama. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Khatulistiwa, 1(1), pp.1-13.
Swastika, G. T., Nusantara, T., Subanji, S., & Irawati, S. (2023). How Do Assimilation and Accommodation Occur in The Translation Process of Representation? Participatory Educational Research, 10(3), 167–190. https://doi.org/10.17275/per.23.50.10.3
Ulya, H. (2016). Profil kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa bermotivasi belajar tinggi berdasarkan ideal problem solving. Jurnal Konseling Gusjigang, 2(1), 90–96.
Weintrop, D., Beheshti, E., Horn, M., Orton, K., Jona, K., Trouille, L., & Wilensky, U. (2016). Defining Computational Thinking for Mathematics and Science Classrooms. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 25(1), 127–147. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-015-9581-5
Yarmayani, A. (2016). Analisis kemampuan pemecahan masalah matematis siswa kelas xi mipa sma negeri 1 kota jambi. Jurnal Ilmiah Dikdaya, 6(2), 12–19. https://doi.org/10.33087/dikdaya.v6i2.9
Zuhri, M. S. (2013). Karakteristik penalaran siswa kelas xi sekolah menengah atas tentang sampel yang memiliki kemampuan matematika rendah. AKSIOMA: Jurnal Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika, 4(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.26877/aks.v4i1/MARET.749
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Hanni Juliyanti
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
